Beland v. Ortiz
| Victoria Beland |
| Napoleon Ortiz and JP Morgan Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. |
| 3:2017cv01816 |
| March 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 41 Stipulation Change Name of Trust. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2017)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Stipulation for Plaintiff to Change Name for Defendant JPMorgan Manhattan Bank in First Amended Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation for Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 28 Stipulation Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(a) to Continue the Deadline for Circulating Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Scheduled for September 1, 2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2017)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 24 Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference Scheduled For August 1, 2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 19 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
