Rudin v. Ganley Westside Imports, Inc. et al
| Rudin and Justin Rudin |
| Ganley Westside Imports, Inc, Ganley Westside Imports, Inc. and Fifth Third Bank |
| 3:2017cv02028 |
| April 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Northern; Case Number 1:16-cv-02961. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 17 Certified Transfer Order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on 4/05/2017, transferring the within action to the Northern District of California, In Re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2672. (R,Sh) |
| Filing 16 Motion for ruling on Plaintiff's #5 Motion to Remand and Defendant Ganley's #8 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL No. 2672 filed by Plaintiff Justin Rudin. (Rudin, Justin) Modified on 3/24/2017 (S,HR). |
| Filing 15 Reply in support of #8 Emergency Motion to remand to State Court and Brief Opposing Stay filed by Justin Rudin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - United States of America v. Volkswagen, #2 Exhibit B - Department of Justice News)(Rudin, Justin) |
| Filing 14 Reply in support of its #5 Motion to Stay and Response to Plaintiff's #8 Emergency Motion to remand to State Court filed by Ganley Westside Imports, Inc. (Bode, Hugh) Modified text to match document on 1/13/2017 (M,TL). |
Filing 13
Order granting motion by attorney Jeffrey Hinebaugh to withdraw as attorney for defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Related Doc #12 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 1/11/2017.(P,J)
|
| Filing 12 Motion by Jeffrey Hinebaugh to withdraw as attorney filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Stefanski, Alicia) Modified description of attachment on 1/11/2017 (M,TL). |
| Notice to Attorney Jeffrey P. Hinebaugh. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. Related document(s) #11 . (G,CA) |
| Filing 11 Answer to Complaint filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Stefanski, Alicia) Modified text to remove duplicate wording and attorney notified on 1/3/2017 (M,TL). |
|
Filing 10
Order granting Fifth Third Bank's #7 Motion for extension of time to answer. Fifth Third Bank answer due 12/30/2016. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/22/16.(S,HR)
|
|
Order: [non-document] Defendant Ganley's motion for an extension of time in which to answer (Doc. No. #4 ) is granted. Defendant Ganley shall have 45 days after the Court either denies the motion for a stay (Doc. No. #5 ) or, if the Court grants the stay, lifts the stay to answer the complaint. Additionally, defendant Ganley shall have until January 13, 2017 to respond to plaintiff's motion to remand (Doc. No. #8 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 12/22/16.(H,KR)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying corporate parent Fifth Third Bancorp for Fifth Third Bank filed by Fifth Third Bank. (Stefanski, Alicia) Modified to add corporate parent on 12/21/2016 (M,TL). |
| Filing 8 Emergency Motion to remand to State Court and Brief Opposing Stay filed by Plaintiff Justin Rudin. Related document(s) #1 , #5 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Potential Tag-Along Actions, #2 Exhibit B -Conditional Transfer Order, #3 Exhibit C - Transfer Order MDL 2286, #4 Exhibit D - Transfer Order MDL 2672, #5 Exhibit E - Catherine Taylor v. Scott Motors, #6 Exhibit F -Testimony of Michael Horn, #7 Exhibit G - Partial Consent Decree, #8 Exhibit H - Fylypovych v. Volkswagen)(Rudin, Justin) Modified text to match document on 12/21/2016 (M,TL). |
| Notice by Clerk that Fifth Third Bank failed to file a corporate disclosure statement as required by Local Rule 3.13(b). (M,TL) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 12/30/2016 to answer Complaint filed by Defendant Fifth Third Bank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Agreed Entry)(Stefanski, Alicia) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Ganley Westside Imports, Inc.. (Bode, Hugh) |
| Filing 5 Motion to stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL filed by Defendant Ganley Westside Imports, Inc.. (Bode, Hugh) |
| Filing 4 Motion for extension of time to answer filed by Defendant Ganley Westside Imports, Inc.. (Bode, Hugh) |
| Filing 3 Initial Standing Order. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/12/2016. (P,J) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (S,SR) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Common Pleas, case number CV 16 871702 Filing fee paid. $400. Receipt # 14660091308. Filed by Ganley Westside Imports, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-state court documents) (S,SR) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (S,SR) |
| Judge Sara Lioi assigned to case. (S,SR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
