Cole v. Adam et al
Robert Hugh Cole |
Nancy Adam and Susan Waddell |
3:2017cv05691 |
October 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Del Norte |
Beth Labson Freeman |
PSLC HHL |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' REPLY DECLARATION.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/4/2019. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/5/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 47 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Reply to Motion to Compel due by 11/16/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Beth Labson Freeman.Granting 38 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to 34 Objection.Reply due by 9/30/2018. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2018) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/17/2018: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tshS, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.