Aguilar v. Ford Motor Company
Lilian Aguilar |
Ford Motor Company |
5:2017cv05927 |
October 16, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Lucy H Koh |
Contract Product Liability |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-00951. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2018) |
Filing 18 TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, that the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Central District of California are transferred to the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2018) |
Filing 17 Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh in case 5:17-cv-05613-LHK; Granting (20) Administrative Motion Stay in case 5:17-cv-05885-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:17-cv-05885-LHK, 5:17-cv-05613-LHK, 5:17-cv-05615-LHK, 5:17-cv-05620-LHK, 5:17-cv-05698-LHK, 5:17-cv-05704-LHK, 5:17-cv-05705-LHK, 5:17-cv-05706-LHK, 5:17-cv-05711-LHK, 5:17-cv-05712-LHK, 5:17-cv-05747-LHK, 5:17-cv-05750-LHK, 5:17-cv-05751-LHK, 5:17-cv-05900-LHK, 5:17-cv-05915-LHK, 5:17-cv-05922-LHK, 5:17-cv-05924-LHK, 5:17-cv-05925-LHK, 5:17-cv-05927-LHK, 5:17-cv-05978-LHK, 5:17-cv-05996-LHK, 5:17-cv-06022-LHK, 5:17-cv-06121-LHK, 5:17-cv-06128-LHK, 5:17-cv-06201-LHK, 5:17-cv-06205-LHK, 5:17-cv-06210-LHK, 5:17-cv-06222-LHK. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2017) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #15 MOTION to Remand To Santa Clara County Superior Court. Motion to Remand set for 2/22/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Judge Lucy H. Koh. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand To Santa Clara County Superior Court filed by Lilian Aguilar. Motion Hearing set for 2/21/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 11/28/2017. Replies due by 12/5/2017. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points & Authority, #2 Declaration Rowena Santos, #3 Request For Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/14/2017) |
Filing 14 First MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Lilian Aguilar. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/14/2017) |
Filing 13 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/13/2017. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017) |
Filing 12 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 1/17/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7-days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iymS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2017) |
Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh and Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as the referral judge for all further proceedings. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Judge Executive Committee on 10/27/17. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2017) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2017) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/26/2017) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #4 Statement, #3 Jury Demand, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities (Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
Filing 7 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal,, Notice to state court clerk and adverse parties (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice to state court clerk and to adverse parties)(Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company Notice of Answer, filed in state court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Answer, filed in state court)(Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/31/2017. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
Filing 4 Statement of Disclosure [F.R.C.P. 7.1] by Ford Motor Company. (Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ford Motor Company. (Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company (Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 17cv315641. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11801675). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit Civil Lawsuit Notice, #5 Exhibit ADR Information Sheet, #6 Exhibit 10-K filing, #7 Exhibit S. Hugret Decl., #8 Exhibit Extract re SLP fees, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Langner, Bailey) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aguilar v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Bailey J. Langner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lilian Aguilar | |
Represented By: | Gillian Mellon |
Represented By: | Rowena Guillermo Santos |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.