Hernandez v. Contra Costa
| Felipe Hernandez |
| Contra Costa |
| 3:2018cv00267 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 43 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA filed by Contra Costa. Contra Costa terminated. Motions terminated: 33 MOTION to Dismiss NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTIO N TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AN D AUTHORITIES filed by Contra Costa, 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA filed by Contra Costa. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/3/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2018)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 . STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Felipe Hernandez filed by B Hughes, Contra Costa, Felipe Hernandez, Michael Proctor, Michael McGary, Zaragosa, B Battles, N Andrews. Case referred to mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/24/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2018)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting Contra Costa County's 19 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the first cause of action as to the County. Second Amended Complaint is due by 8/14/2018. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2018)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 16 Stipulated Protective Order for Standard Litigation. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2018)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DATE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS filed by Contra Costa, Felipe Hernandez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/23/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2018)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND re 8 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DATE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES filed by Contra Costa, Felipe Hernandez. Case Management Statement due by 7/3/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/10/2018 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/30/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. Contra Costa | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Felipe Hernandez | |
| Represented By: | John L. Burris |
| Represented By: | James Cook |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Nisenbaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Contra Costa | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
