Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
| Uniloc USA, Inc. and UNILOC Luxembourg S.A. |
| Apple, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00360 |
| January 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William Alsup |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
204
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (denying (164) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:18-cv-00363-WHA; denying (173) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:18-cv-00360-WHA; denying (194) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:18-cv-00365-WHA; denying (184) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:18-cv-00572-WHA). Signed by Judge Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019)
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER DENYING 185 MOTION TO RELATE. Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2019)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, TO FILE UNDER SEAL, AND TO INTERVENE AND ORDER VACATING HEARING (denying (158) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (159) Motion for Reconsideration ; granting (168) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00363-WHA; denying (167) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (168) Motion for Reconsideration ; granting (177) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00360-WHA; denying (188) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (189) Motion for Reconsideration ; granting (198) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00365-WHA; denying (178) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (179) Motion for Reconsideration ; granting (188) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00572-WHA). Signed by Judge Alsup. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2019)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL AND MOTION TO INTERVENE (denying (128) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (135) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (140) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part (146) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00363-WHA; denying (134) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (141) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (146) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part (152) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00360-WHA; denying (158) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (165) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (170) Administrative Mot ion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part (176) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00365-WHA; denying (148) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (155) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying (160) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part (166) Motion to Intervene in case 3:18-cv-00572-WHA). Signed by Judge Alsup. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE (granting in part and denying in part (79) Motion for Protective Order in case 3:18-cv-00363-WHA; granting in part and denying in part (84) Motion for Protective Order in case 3:18-cv-00360-WHA; granting in part and denying in part (79) Motion for Protective Order in case 3:18-cv-00365-WHA; granting in part and denying in part (81) Motion for Protective Order in case 3:18-cv-00572-WHA). Signed by Judge Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
