XR Communications, LLC v. ARRIS Solutions, Inc.
XR Communications, LLC and XR Communications, LLC doing business as Vivato Technologies |
ARRIS Solutions, Inc. |
3:2018cv02736 |
May 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
William H Orrick |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Richard L. Seabolt / NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF RICHARD L. SEABOLT AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC. (Seabolt, Richard) (Filed on 6/26/2018) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Shaw Salceda (Salceda, Patrick) (Filed on 6/18/2018) |
Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING STAY OF LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS by Judge William H. Orrick granting #27 Stipulation. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2018) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR STAY OF LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEWS filed by XR Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kent N. Shum, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 6/4/2018) |
Filing 26 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Judge Jeffrey S. White no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/31/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2018) |
Filing 25 ORDER RELATING CASE. This matter is found to be related to Case No. 3:18cv1992-WHO. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/30/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2018) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses byARRIS Solutions, Inc.. (Yungwirth, Matthew) (Filed on 5/30/2018) |
Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #17 Motion for Pro Hac Vice re Alice Snedeker. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2018) |
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE granting #16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice RE Matthew S. Yunwirth. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2018) |
Filing 21 ORDER by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE granting #7 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (LOCAL RULE 7.1-1). (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2018) |
Filing 20 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/17/18. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/3/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/10/2018 11:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2018) |
Filing 19 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committeeon 5/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2018) |
Filing 18 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2018) |
Filing 17 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12358397.) filed by ARRIS Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Snedeker, Alice) (Filed on 5/16/2018) |
Filing 16 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-12358380.) filed by ARRIS Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Yungwirth, Matthew) (Filed on 5/16/2018) |
Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Entities by ARRIS Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Ruckus Wireless, Inc. for ARRIS Solutions, Inc.. re #14 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge (Seabolt, Richard) (Filed on 5/16/2018) |
Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by ARRIS Solutions, Inc... (Seabolt, Richard) (Filed on 5/16/2018) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard L. Seabolt (Seabolt, Richard) (Filed on 5/16/2018) |
Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 5/24/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018) |
Filing 11 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Patent Infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018) |
Filing 10 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/1/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/8/2018 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to ARRIS Solutions, Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018) |
Filing 8 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/24/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2018) |
Filing 7 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES (LOCAL RULE 7.1-1) filed by XR Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Mirzaie - Redacted, #2 Proposed Order, #3 180509 Cert of Interested Parties (redacted), #4 Declaration Mirzaie - Unredacted, #5 180509 Cert of Interested Parties (unredacted))(Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by XR Communications, LLC OF RELATED CASE (Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by XR Communications, LLC REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR TRADEMARK (Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by XR Communications, LLC (Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by XR Communications, LLC . (Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against ARRIS Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12339534.). Filed byXR Communications, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Mirzaie, Reza) (Filed on 5/9/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.