Kappelman v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
William Kappelman |
California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, Employment Development Department and Patrick Henning |
3:2018cv03104 |
May 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Richard Seeborg |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/2/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019) |
Filing 40 STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 4/11/2019 at 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 4/4/2019. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/13/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2019) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 CONTINUING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 12/13/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2018 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Chambers. All parties shall appear telephonically and must contact Court Conference at (866) 582-6878 at least one week prior to the Conference to arrange their participation. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/29/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2018) |
Filing 23 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 granting petitioner leave to file amended verified petition and complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/10/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.