Reighley v. U.S. Roche Health and Welfare Benefits Non-VEBA Plan et al

Plaintiff: Joseph Reighley
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and U.S. Roche Health and Welfare Benefits Non-VEBA Plan
Case Number: 3:2018cv04164
Filed: July 12, 2018
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
0 Judge: Vince Chhabria
1 Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
July 12, 2018 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/4/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/11/2018 10:00 AM. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2018)
July 12, 2018 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/26/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2018)
July 12, 2018 3 Proposed Summons. (Kantor, Glenn) (Filed on 7/12/2018)
July 12, 2018 2 Civil Cover Sheet against All Defendants. Filed byJoseph Reighley. (Roberts, Michelle) (Filed on 7/12/2018) Modified on 7/13/2018 (hdjS, COURT STAFF).
July 12, 2018 #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be randomly assigned to Judge due to lack of Civil Cover Sheet. Please file completed Civil Cover Sheet as a separate docket entry Re: #1 Complaint filed by Joseph Reighley (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2018)
July 12, 2018 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12506876.). Filed byJoseph Reighley. (Roberts, Michelle) (Filed on 7/12/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reighley v. U.S. Roche Health and Welfare Benefits Non-VEBA Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Represented By: Sean Patrick Nalty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Roche Health and Welfare Benefits Non-VEBA Plan
Represented By: Angel Lin Garrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Reighley
Represented By: Michelle Lee Roberts
Represented By: Glenn R. Kantor
Represented By: Scott E. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?