Eacret et al v. Crunch, LLC
| Jonathan Kent, Dylan Eacret and Jonathan Kent Merritt |
| Crunch, LLC |
| 3:2018cv04374 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due 10/22/2018 by 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/31/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order for Certain Employment Cases, #3 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2018) |
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 7/25/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2018)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2018) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Crunch, LLC.. (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/24/2018) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Crunch, LLC re #3 Declaration in Support, #2 Declaration in Support, #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Declaration in Support, #5 Certificate of Interested Entities, #7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, 6 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/23/2018) |
| Filing 8 Proof of Filing Notice of Removal to Adverse Party and State Court by Crunch, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/23/2018) Modified on 7/24/2018 (jjbS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10 /10/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/17/2018 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jjbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/1/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Crunch, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Crunch Holdings, LLC for Crunch, LLC. (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 4 Declaration of Keith Worts in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed byCrunch, LLC. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Danny Granados in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed byCrunch, LLC. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Conor Dale in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed byCrunch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Diversity and Class Action Fairness Act Jurisdiction) from County of San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-18-567322. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12525336). Filed byCrunch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dale, Conor) (Filed on 7/18/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
