California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc.
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant: Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv04861
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2018 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by California Sportfishing Protection Alliance.. (Davis, Rebecca) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
August 27, 2018 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/10/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2018 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/24/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Davis, Rebecca) (Filed on 8/10/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12586450.). Filed byCalifornia Sportfishing Protection Alliance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, Rebecca) (Filed on 8/10/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Represented By: Rebecca Leah Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keefe Kaplan Maritime, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?