Dunklin v. Comcast Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Donacin O. Dunklin
Defendant: Omid Aziz and Comcast Corporation
Case Number: 3:2018cv04883
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Mateo
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2018 Filing 17 Certificate of Interested Entities by Comcast Corporation (Stortz, Michael) (Filed on 10/2/2018)
October 2, 2018 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Comcast Corporation (Stortz, Michael) (Filed on 10/2/2018)
October 2, 2018 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Comcast Corporation (Stortz, Michael) (Filed on 10/2/2018)
October 2, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Brooks Sabb Veggian for Plaintiff (Veggian, Lauren) (Filed on 10/2/2018)
September 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #12 Stipulation To Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline. Deadline for Comcast to file a responsive pleading is extended to 11/5/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2018)
September 27, 2018 Filing 12 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stiuplation to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline [Civil L.R. 6-1]; [Proposed] Order filed by Comcast Corporation. (Stortz, Michael) (Filed on 9/27/2018)
September 25, 2018 Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Comcast Corporation.. (Stortz, Michael) (Filed on 9/25/2018)
September 7, 2018 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: In light of the due date for the amended complaint, the court continues the CMC from 11/8/2018 to 1/10/2019 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 1/3/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 7, 2018 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/21/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
September 7, 2018 Filing 8 STIPULATION to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline filed by Comcast Corporation. (Stortz, Michael) (Filed on 9/7/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Omid Aziz, Comcast Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 13, 2018 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2018 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/24/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Donacin O. Dunklin.. (Cardoza, Michael) (Filed on 8/10/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Cardoza, Michael) (Filed on 8/10/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Cardoza, Michael) (Filed on 8/10/2018)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12587799.). Filed byDonacin O. Dunklin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Cardoza, Michael) (Filed on 8/10/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunklin v. Comcast Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omid Aziz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comcast Corporation
Represented By: Michael James Stortz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donacin O. Dunklin
Represented By: Michael Frederick Cardoza
Represented By: Lauren Brooks Sabb Veggian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?