Cameron et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company
Lindsay Cameron and Andrew Cameron |
State Farm General Insurance Company |
3:2018cv06804 |
November 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
William H Orrick |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 02, 17th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 1/29/2019. Signed by Judge W on 11/21/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
Filing 7 ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/21/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2018) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by State Farm General Insurance Company.. (Ellingson, Stephen) (Filed on 11/20/2018) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/31/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/7/2019 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2018) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Victor J. Jacobellis (Jacobellis, Victor) (Filed on 11/14/2018) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/23/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2018) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sonoma County Superior Court. Their case number is SCV-263328. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12835894). Filed byState Farm General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ellingson, Stephen) (Filed on 11/9/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.