Johnson v. Kernan
Petitioner: Derrick L. Johnson
Respondent: Scott Kernan
Case Number: 3:2018cv07048
Filed: November 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D Laporte
Referring Judge: PSLC MSH
2 Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S EX PARTE APPLICATION by Judge Jon S. Tigar; denying #9 Ex Parte Application. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate/Proof of Service, #(2) Prisoner IFP Form) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2019)
January 8, 2019 Filing 9 Ex Parte Application filed by Derrick L. Johnson. (Attachments: #(1) Envelope)(tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019)
January 8, 2019 Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 8, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019)
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 8, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2019)
December 3, 2018 Filing 6 Letter dated 11/27/18; from Derrick Johnson re Notice of Appeal Petitioner's Claim to the Supreme Court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2018)
November 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/30/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2018)
November 29, 2018 Sent Copy of #4 Order to S.F. Intake Department. Re #4 Order (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Clerk to Reassign Case to District Judge by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 11/29/2018 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018) Modified on 11/29/2018 (shyS, COURT STAFF).
November 20, 2018 Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018)
November 20, 2018 Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 12/28/2018. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018)
November 20, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed byDerrick L. Johnson. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Kernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Kernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick L. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?