Wade v. Alsup et al
| E. K. Wade |
| Bobbie J. Montoya, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, William H. Alsup, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Richard R. Clifton, James Donato, William H. Orrick and Phillip A. Talbert |
| 3:2018mc80210 |
| December 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 [Proposed] Order Granting re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction to Sue William H. Alsup, et al filed by E. K. Wade. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2018) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of E. K. Wade in Support of #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction to Sue William H. Alsup, et al filed byE. K. Wade. (Related document(s) #2 ) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2018) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction to Sue William H. Alsup, et al filed by E. K. Wade. Responses due by 12/26/2018. Replies due by 1/2/2019. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages; Demand for Jury Trial (no process) against William H. Alsup, Richard R. Clifton, James Donato, Elizabeth D. Laporte, Bobbie J. Montoya, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, William H. Orrick, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Phillip A. Talbert. Filed by E. K. Wade. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
