Mobile Network Solutions, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mobile Network Solutions, LLC and Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2019cv00219
Filed: January 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/16/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/23/2019 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/12/2019. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER RELATING CASE. C-19-219 EDL and C-19-217 KAW are related. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/11/2019. (ivaS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2019)
February 11, 2019 Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2019)
January 25, 2019 Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC.. (Connor, Cabrach) (Filed on 1/25/2019)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting #13 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019)
January 17, 2019 Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies, Inc. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
January 17, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Cabrach J. Connor ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13010880.) filed by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/17/2019) Modified on 1/17/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
January 16, 2019 Filing 12 ERRATA re #10 Proposed Summons, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, #11 Summons Returned Unexecuted, #3 Proposed Summons, #1 Complaint, by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Errata Corrected Complaint, #2 Errata Corrected Exhibit A, #3 Errata Corrected Exhibit B, #4 Errata Corrected Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Errata Corrected Certificate, #6 Errata Corrected Summons (Requested))(Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/16/2019)
January 16, 2019 Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC as to Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/16/2019)
January 16, 2019 Filing 10 Proposed Summons. (Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/16/2019)
January 16, 2019 Filing 9 ERRONEOUSLY E-FILED: DUPLICATIVE OF DOCKET NUMBER #2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities CORRECTION OF DOCKET #2 (Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/16/2019) Modified on 1/16/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
January 16, 2019 Filing 8 ERRONEOUSLY E-FILED: DUPLICATIVE OF DOCKET NUMBER #1 COMPLAINT CORRECTION OF DOCKET #1 against All Defendants. Filed byMobile Network Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/16/2019) Modified on 1/16/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).
January 16, 2019 #Electronic filing error. Duplicate entry. [err103]This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #10 Proposed Summons filed by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC, #8 Complaint filed by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC, #9 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC Plaintiff must e-file an Errata stating the correct name of plaintiff do not e-file the complaint it will only be considered a duplicate of docket number #1 especially when counsel did not modify plaintiff's name to the correct spelling. Also, counsel must e-file the original summons docket number #6 as summons returned unexecuted in order for the clerk to re issue the new requested summons. Although Counsel sent their request and explained the requested necessary changes by e-mail it can not be honored the request must be e-filed only. (aaaS, COURT STAFF)
January 14, 2019 Filing 7 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding: PATENT INFRINGEMENT (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019)
January 14, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies, Inc. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019)
January 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/9/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/16/2019 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/14/19. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019)
January 14, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/28/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2019)
January 11, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/11/2019)
January 11, 2019 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Monument Patent Holdings, LLC for Mobile Network Solutions, LLC. (Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/11/2019)
January 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; against Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12997980.). Filed by Mobile Network Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lobbin, Stephen) (Filed on 1/11/2019) Modified on 1/14/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mobile Network Solutions, LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mobile Network Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Stephen Michael Lobbin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Stephen Michael Lobbin
Represented By: Cabrach John Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?