United States of America v. Chiang
| United States of America |
| Michael Chiang |
| 3:2019cv00769 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Responses due by 5/10/2019. Replies due by 5/17/2019. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/31/2019 09:00 AM. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019) |
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 18, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2019)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE. Please disregard the previously filed Clerk's Notice [Doc. NO. 8]. This was issued in error. The Court will schedule a hearing on the Petition to Enforce IRS Subpoena shortly. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2019) |
|
Filing 9
RELATED CASE ORDER. C 19-769 MMC and C 19-770 NC are related. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 7, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2019)
|
|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/31/2019 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 5/24/2019.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 4, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order)(mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2019)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2019)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (djmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2019) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United States of America.. (Stier, Cynthia) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/14/2019. (djmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2019) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Relate Case Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed by United States of America. (Stier, Cynthia) (Filed on 2/13/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/27/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2019) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Enforce IRS Summons . Filed byUnited States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Stier, Cynthia) (Filed on 2/12/2019) Modified on 3/12/2019 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Chiang | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Cynthia Lewis Stier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Michael Chiang | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
