Al Dulaymi v. Bardini, et al
| Mustafa Aiyed Mohan Al Dulaymi |
| Emilia M. Bardini, William P. Barr, Kirstjen Nielsen and Kevin McAleenan |
| 3:2019cv01464 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Emilia M. Bardini, William P. Barr, Kevin McAleenan. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2019) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Anzarouth, Alan) (Filed on 6/5/2019) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byMustafa Aiyed Mohan Al Dulaymi. (Anzarouth, Alan) (Filed on 6/5/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mustafa Aiyed Mohan Al Dulaymi.. (Anzarouth, Alan) (Filed on 6/3/2019) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S THIRD NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 6/3/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2019) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 5/16/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2019) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 4/22/2019. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2019) |
| Filing 3 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/4/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2019) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 0971-13189386). Filed by Mustafa Aiyed Mohan Al Dulaymi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Anzarouth, Alan) (Filed on 3/21/2019) Modified on 3/21/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
