Sepehry-Fard v. Patel et.al.
| Fareed Sepehry-Fard |
| Adam N. Barasch, Amar R. Patel, Bernard J Kornberg, William A. Aspinwall, Mark Joseph Kenney, Joseph W Guzzetta, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Severson & Werson APC |
| 3:2019cv01601 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court has issued an #13 Order staying this case. The case management conference set for 6/26/2019 is vacated. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2019) |
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL AND STAYING CASE by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting #12 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2019)
|
| Filing 12 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Fareed Sepehry-Fard. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A-Redacted Document for Filing Under Seal, #(2) RJN Set 1 Exhibit A, Filed Under Seal, #(3) Exhibit B - Unredacted, #(4) [Proposed] Order, #(5) Proof of Service) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2019) |
|
Filing 11
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ADD ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS/CAUSES OF ACTIONS AND REQUEST WITNESS PROTECTION AT 18 USC 1512 et. seq.; MEMORANDUM OF LAW, DECLARATION filed by Fareed Sepehry-Fard. Responses due by 4/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit True and correct copies communication letter regarding my cease and desist demand to Compushare on April 10, 2019, which was send by registered and certified mail restricted delivery. i: notified Compushare that there are several verified criminal complaints presently against all entities and people who have fraudulently filed manufactured papers in county recorder to give a semblance of ownership of my private property which are criminal offenses punishable with prison terms at inter alia, 18 US Code 471, 472 and 473--Securities fraud which has prison term of up to 20 years per count and there are several dozens of these criminal conduct and others., #2 Exhibit rue and correct copies of the of form 1099 A received from alleged debt collector Nationstar which has fraudulently acted as an imposter by filing another false "Acquisition or Abandonment of Secured Property" labeling itself as "Lender" and falsely file a form 1099-A to give a false illusion of Nationstar having a "secured interest" for my private property dated 1/27/2018 while Nationstar had also sold the manufactured security for Plaintiff's home, on or about January 1, 2017, to unknown entities without paying any taxes on those false alleged financial transactions and while obtaining TARP and other incentives from the government and without Trustee for the closed trust to wit:, #3 Exhibit True and correct copies of Plaintiff's Identity Theft report to Credit Reporting Agency Experian Report number 2722-6720-78, where it shows that Plaintiff's identity has been stolen by having 16 different variations of Plaintiff's identity and name, where none of those 16 names used are correct and in addition having several incorrect addresses for Plaintiff, and further having an incorrect Social Security Number for Plaintiff that ends with number 6, the correct Social Security Number ends with number 7. RJN Set 1 Exhibit 3 also includes Plaintiff's police report regarding Plaintiff's identity theft, #4 Exhibit True and correct copies of order by judge Folan of SANTA CLARA COUNTY Court ordering the Defendants and their culprits to furnish authenticated amount of alleged debt to Plaintiff by February 28, 2017, but Defendants never furnished those authenticated and accurate alleged amounts allegedly due, to Plaintiff in spite of the order of the judge of SANTA CLARA COUNTY Court, in fact Defendants send several conflicting amount, #5 Exhibit True and correct copies of several varying amount of alleged debt in opposition)(Sepehry-Fard, Fareed) (Filed on 4/12/2019)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Amended Pleadings due by 5/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #7 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
|
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 6/19/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/26/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Fareed Sepehry-Fard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Jon S. Tigar. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
| Filing 5 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Fareed Sepehry-Fard.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties/ Notice to agent is Notice to principle and Notice to Principle is Notice to Agent - Lucy H. Koh, Edward J. Davila, Beth Labson Freeman, Mariano Florentino Cuellar, Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. by Fareed Sepehry-Fard (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) Modified text on 3/27/2019 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Fareed Sepehry-Fard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT for (1) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (2) Unfair Business Practices; (3) Libel; (4) Malicious Conduct; (5) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage; (6) False Light; (7) Violation of Section 20 A of Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (8) Accounting; (9) Injunctive and Declaratory Relief; Demand for Oral Hearing against All Defendants. Filed by Fareed Sepehry-Fard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
