Salesforce.com, Inc. v. GEA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Salesforce.com, Inc.
Defendant: GEA, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv01710
Filed: April 2, 2019
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Filing 27 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #18 MOTION to Dismiss GEA, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss or Transfer ) filed bySalesforce.com, Inc.. (Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 7/9/2019)
July 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY AND CONTINUING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge Jon S. Tigar. Case Management Statement due 9/16/2019 by 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/23/2019 2:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. Motion Hearing Continued from 7/11/19, now set for 8/8/2019 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2019)
July 2, 2019 Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua L Young and Daniel J. Weinberg on Behalf of Defendant GEA, Inc. (Young, Joshua) (Filed on 7/2/2019)
July 1, 2019 Filing 24 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to (re #23 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE A 3-PAGE SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GEA, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND IMPROPER VENUE OR, IN THE ALTERANTIVE, TO TRANSFER) filed by GEA, Inc.. (Freitas, Robert) (Filed on 7/1/2019)
June 27, 2019 Filing 23 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE A 3-PAGE SUR-REPLY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GEA, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND IMPROPER VENUE OR, IN THE ALTERANTIVE, TO TRANSFER filed by Salesforce.com, Inc.. Responses due by 7/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ROBERT J. NOLAN, #2 Proposed Order)(Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 6/27/2019)
June 27, 2019 Filing 22 OBJECTIONS to SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF LESLIE FARKAS PURSUANT TO L.R. 7-3(D)(1) filed by Salesforce.com, Inc.. (Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 6/27/2019)
June 20, 2019 Filing 21 REPLY (re #18 GEA, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue or, in the alternative, to Transfer) filed by GEA, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Leslie Farkas)(Freitas, Robert) (Filed on 6/20/2019)
June 13, 2019 Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to (re #18 GEA, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue or, in the Alternative, to Transfer) filed by Salesforce.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aseem Gupta, #2 Declaration of Robert J. Nolan)(Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 6/13/2019)
June 12, 2019 Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due 8/7/2019 BY 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/14/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2019)
May 30, 2019 Filing 18 GEA, Inc.s Notice of Motion & Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue or, in the alternative, to Transfer; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by GEA, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 7/11/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Responses due by 6/13/2019. Replies due by 6/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Leslie Farkas, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Proposed Order)(Freitas, Robert) (Filed on 5/30/2019)
May 20, 2019 Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Statement due 6/26/2019 by 5:00 PM. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/3/2019 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order) (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2019)
May 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 05/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2019)
May 16, 2019 Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2019)
May 15, 2019 Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by GEA, Inc... (Freitas, Robert) (Filed on 5/15/2019)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu conditionally granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed on 5/9/2019.(dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2019)
May 6, 2019 Filing 12 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer ) filed bySalesforce.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Robert Nolan, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order)(Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 5/6/2019)
May 1, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 5/15/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
April 30, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by GEA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert E. Freitas, #2 Proposed Order)(Freitas, Robert) (Filed on 4/30/2019)
April 30, 2019 Filing 9 Notice of Special Appearance on Behalf of Defendant GEA, Inc. by Robert E. Freitas. (Freitas, Robert) (Filed on 4/30/2019) Modified on 5/1/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
April 17, 2019 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Salesforce.com, Inc... (Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 4/17/2019)
April 15, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Salesforce.com, Inc. re #1 Complaint, (Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 4/15/2019)
April 4, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to GEA, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2019)
April 4, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/26/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/3/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2019)
April 3, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/17/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2019)
April 2, 2019 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Salesforce.com, Inc. (Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
April 2, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 4/2/2019)
April 2, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF; Demand for Jury Trial against GEA, Inc., (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13225257). Filed by Salesforce.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit 1, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Nolan, Robert) (Filed on 4/2/2019) Modified on 4/4/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salesforce.com, Inc. v. GEA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEA, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua L Young
Represented By: Daniel Justin Weinberg
Represented By: Robert E. Freitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Salesforce.com, Inc.
Represented By: Robert John Nolan
Represented By: Jenny Grantz
Represented By: Elliott J Joh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?