Norton v. Lyft, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Norton
Defendant: Lyft, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv02025
Filed: April 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Filing 26 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Amended Complaint) against Lyft, Inc.. Filed byDavid Norton. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 7/8/2019)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #24 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule on Defendant's Motions.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019)
July 2, 2019 Reset Deadlines as to #22 MOTION to Dismiss , #20 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. Responses due by 7/11/2019. Replies due by 7/23/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019)
July 1, 2019 Filing 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Briefing Schedule on Defendant's Motions filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of R. James Slaughter in Support of Joint Stipulation)(Slaughter, R.) (Filed on 7/1/2019)
June 18, 2019 Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO A DATE AFTER THE HEARING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO COMPEL. Case Management Statement due by 8/14/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/21/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2019)
June 17, 2019 Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Lyft, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/8/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 7/1/2019. Replies due by 7/8/2019. (Slaughter, R.) (Filed on 6/17/2019)
June 17, 2019 Filing 21 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Lyft's Motion to Compel Arbitration filed byLyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 2 to Request for Judicial Notice)(Slaughter, R.) (Filed on 6/17/2019)
June 17, 2019 Filing 20 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings filed by Lyft, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/8/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 7/1/2019. Replies due by 7/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Oluwabukunmi Ayanbule, #3 Exhibit A to Declaration of Ayanbule, #4 Exhibit B to Declaration of Ayanbule, #5 Declaration of Nikolas Laufer-Edel, #6 Exhibit A to Declaration of Laufer-Edel, #7 Exhibit B to Declaration of Laufer-Edel, #8 Declaration of Jeannie Lieu, #9 Exhibit A to Declaration of Lieu, #10 Exhibit B to Declaration of Lieu, #11 Exhibit C to Declaration of Lieu, #12 Exhibit D to Declaration of Lieu, #13 Declaration of Erin E. Meyer)(Slaughter, R.) (Filed on 6/17/2019)
June 12, 2019 Filing 19 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Slaughter, R.) (Filed on 6/12/2019)
June 3, 2019 Filing 18 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lyft, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Rakuten, Inc. for Lyft, Inc.. (Meyer, Erin) (Filed on 6/3/2019)
June 3, 2019 Filing 17 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Meyer, Erin) (Filed on 6/3/2019)
June 3, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin E. Meyer (Meyer, Erin) (Filed on 6/3/2019)
June 3, 2019 Filing 15 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 6/3/2019)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 6/12/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/19/2019 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor.. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/15/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2019)
May 7, 2019 Filing 13 Case reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Judge Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2019)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RELATING CASES 13-cv-04065-VC, Cotter v. Lyft, Inc. and 19-cv-02025-EMCNorton v. Lyft, Inc. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/6/2019. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2019)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2019. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/1/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
May 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 5/1/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
May 1, 2019 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2019)
April 30, 2019 Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by David Norton (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 4/30/2019)
April 30, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David Norton.. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 4/30/2019)
April 18, 2019 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by David Norton. Service waived by Lyft, Inc. waiver sent on 4/16/2019, answer due 6/17/2019. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 4/18/2019)
April 17, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendant Lyft, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019)
April 17, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/8/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2019)
April 16, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/30/2019. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2019)
April 15, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 4/15/2019)
April 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, The California Labor Code, Wage Order 9 and California's Unfair Competition Law; Claims for Damages and Injunctive Relief; Demand for Jury Trial against Lyft, Inc.. Filed by David Norton. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 4/15/2019) (Filing Fee of $400.00 paid with receipt number 0971-13262534). Modified on 4/16/2019 (srnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norton v. Lyft, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Norton
Represented By: Jahan C. Sagafi
Represented By: Laura Iris Mattes
Represented By: Michael J. Scimore
Represented By: Adam Levin Koshkin
Represented By: Katharine Chao
Represented By: Christian Schreiber
Represented By: Rachel M. Bien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lyft, Inc.
Represented By: R. James Slaughter
Represented By: Erin E. Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?