Lebronze Alloys SAS v. Tesla Motors, Inc
Plaintiff: Lebronze Alloys SAS
Defendant: Tesla Motors, Inc
Case Number: 4:2019cv02918
Filed: May 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Donna M Ryu
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2019 Filing 14 SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Tesla Motors, Inc., Lebronze Alloys SAS. (Atkinson, Gordon) (Filed on 7/17/2019) Modified on 7/18/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
July 9, 2019 Filing 13 ***DISREGARD, ENTERED INTO THIS CASE IN ERROR***CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2019) Modified on 7/9/2019 (kcS, COURT STAFF).
July 9, 2019 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tesla Motors, Inc.. (Atkinson, Gordon) (Filed on 7/9/2019)
June 25, 2019 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE TO DEFENDANT Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/9/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2019)
June 21, 2019 Filing 10 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Tesla Motors, Inc., Lebronze Alloys SAS. (Atkinson, Gordon) (Filed on 6/21/2019) Modified on 6/24/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).
June 18, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lebronze Alloys SAS.. (Fineman, Martin) (Filed on 6/18/2019)
June 14, 2019 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/28/2019. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #6 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2019)
June 5, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document Motion to Remove Documents from Record and Proposed Order filed by Lebronze Alloys SAS. (Fineman, Martin) (Filed on 6/5/2019)
May 30, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Tesla Motors, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2019)
May 30, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2019 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2019)
May 29, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/12/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2019)
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Fineman, Martin) (Filed on 5/28/2019)
May 28, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Breach of Contract, Breach of the Covernant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Fraud and Deceit; Demand for Jury Trial against Tesla Motors, Inc. Filed by Lebronze Alloys SAS. Filing Fee $400.00, Receipt No. 0971-13383528. ***EXHIBITS A AND B REMOVED PER ORDER OF THE COURT AT DOCKET ENTRY #7 *** (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fineman, Martin) (Filed on 5/28/2019) Modified on 5/30/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/7/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2019: #4 EXHIBITS A AND B REMOVED) (cjlS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/25/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lebronze Alloys SAS v. Tesla Motors, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lebronze Alloys SAS
Represented By: Martin L. Fineman
Represented By: Kelly Michelle Gorton
Represented By: Monder Khoury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tesla Motors, Inc
Represented By: Gordon C. Atkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?