Alexander v. California Dept. of Motor Vehicles et al
| Michael Alexander |
| Mayor Sue Vaterlaus, City of Pacifica, Chief Dan Steidle, San Mateo County Superior Court, Commissioner Jean Shiomoto, Danny Chou, District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe, Judge Anne Bouliane, Theodore Olson, Michael Hartman, Cristina Mazzei, Gerald Buchwald, San Mateo County District, Amarra Lee, California Dept. of Motor Vehicles, Joe Ross, K. Cox, Sharon Cho, Jonathan Karesh, Heather Finlayson, Richard Dubois, Ron Mortenson, Mark Forcum, Nancy Fineman, Pacifica Police Dept., Jeffrey Finigan`, B. Smith, Leland Davis, III, Negreen Abrishamcar, Joseph Scott and Raymond Swope |
| 3:2019cv03996 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCREENING ORDER re #8 First Amended Complaint filed by Michael Alexander. Amended Pleadings due by 10/4/2019. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 9/4/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/4/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (cdnS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #7 Request for extension of time to file First Amended Complaint filed by Michael Alexander. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 8/20/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/20/2019: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (cdnS, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against California Dept. of Motor Vehicles, K. Cox, Ron Mortenson, San Mateo County Superior Court. Filed byMichael Alexander. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2019) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST for extension of time to file First Amended Complaint by Michael Alexander. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2019) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and screening complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 8/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2019)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Alexander. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2019) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Regarding Resources Available to Pro Se Litigants by Michael Alexander (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2019) |
| Filing 3 ***erroneous docket entry*** filed by Michael Alexander. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2019) Modified on 7/16/2019 (hdjS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Negreen Abrishamcar, Anne Bouliane, Gerald Buchwald, California Dept. of Motor Vehicles, Sharon Cho, Danny Chou, City of Pacifica, K. Cox, Leland Davis, III, Richard Dubois, Nancy Fineman, Jeffrey Finigan`, Heather Finlayson, Mark Forcum, Michael Hartman, Jonathan Karesh, Amarra Lee, Cristina Mazzei, Ron Mortenson, Theodore Olson, Pacifica Police Dept., Joe Ross, San Mateo County District, San Mateo County Superior Court, Joseph Scott, Jean Shiomoto, B. Smith, Dan Steidle, Raymond Swope, Sue Vaterlaus, Stephen Wagstaffe. Filed byMichael Alexander. Consent/Declination due by 7/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
