Crawley v. City of Oakland et al
Marcus Crawley and Marcus J Crawley |
California Attorney General and City Of Oakland |
3:2019cv05433 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Edward M Chen |
Sallie Kim |
Constitutional - State Statute |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #21 Stipulation.(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2019) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal of Attorney General filed by Marcus J Crawley. (Crawley, Marcus) (Filed on 10/23/2019) |
Filing 20 REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss ) and Request for Permission to Respond to Reply filed by Marcus J Crawley. (Crawley, Marcus) (Filed on 10/21/2019) Modified on 10/22/2019 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE: Motion Hearing re #18 MOTION to Strike set for 11/27/2019 01:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Strike filed by Marcus J Crawley. Responses due by 10/30/2019. Replies due by 11/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Motion to Strike)(Crawley, Marcus) (Filed on 10/16/2019) |
Filing 17 REPLY in Support (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss) filed by City of Oakland. (Warren, Selia) (Filed on 10/11/2019) |
Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE: Motion Hearing as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss , #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint set for 11/7/2019 is VACATED and SPECIALLY RESET for 11/27/2019 01:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Opposition due by 10/24/2019. Replies due by 10/31/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019) |
Filing 15 Declaration of Service by California Attorney General. (Wise, R.) (Filed on 10/7/2019) Modified on 10/7/2019 (amgS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 14 Request for Judicial Notice filed byMarcus J Crawley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Crawley, Marcus) (Filed on 10/3/2019) |
Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Dismiss , #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ) filed byMarcus J Crawley. (Crawley, Marcus) (Filed on 10/3/2019) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Oakland. Motion Hearing set for 11/7/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 10/4/2019. Replies due by 10/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice)(Warren, Selia) (Filed on 9/20/2019) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by California Attorney General. Motion Hearing set for 11/7/2019 01:30 PM before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 10/4/2019. Replies due by 10/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Wise, R.) (Filed on 9/20/2019) |
Filing 10 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #5 Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2019) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2019 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/12/2019. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2019) |
Filing 8 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 9/16/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2019) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Marcus Crawley. California Attorney General served on 8/30/2019, answer due 9/20/2019 & City of Oakland served on 8/30/2019, answer due 9/20/2019. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Permission for Electronic Case Filing filed by Marcus Crawley. (Attachments: #(1) [Proposed] Order) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Marcus Crawley. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2019) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/25/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/2/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to California Attorney General, City of Oakland. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with Jury Demand) against California Attorney General, City of Oakland, (Filing Fee: $400.00, Receipt No. 4461116487). Filed by Marcus Crawley. Consent/Declination due by 9/12/2019. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Receipt)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.