French v. YRC Worldwide Inc.
| Lorin L. French, Jr. |
| YRC Worldwide Inc. and YRC Worldwide Inc. doing business as YRC, INC. doing business as YRC Freight |
| 3:2019cv05610 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28:1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lorin L. French, Jr. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2019) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/7/2019. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2019) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by YRC Worldwide Inc... (Gonzalez, Anahi) (Filed on 9/19/2019) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by YRC Worldwide Inc. for Notice of Notice of Removal (9/6/19) and USDC Orders (9/12/19) (Gonzalez, Anahi) (Filed on 9/16/2019) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint byYRC Worldwide Inc.. (Mills, Jason) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/28/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/5/2019 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2019) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/20/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by YRC Worldwide Inc. re #2 Certificate of Interested Entities (Mills, Jason) (Filed on 9/6/2019) |
| Filing 2 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed by YRC Worldwide Inc. identifying Other Affiliate YRC INC. dba YRC FREIGHT, Other Affiliate Roadway LLC for YRC Worldwide Inc.. (Mills, Jason) (Filed on 9/5/2019) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-19-578041, (Filing Fee: $400.00, receipt number 0971-13679616) Filed by YRC Worldwide Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Declaration of Jason Mills)(Mills, Jason) (Filed on 9/5/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
