Privette et al v. Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC
Plaintiff: James Privette and Shaunte Jones
Defendant: Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv05729
Filed: September 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Maxine M Chesney
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2020 Filing 33 Certification of ADR Session by Mediator Linda Dardarian: I hereby certify that the parties in this matter held mediation conference calls and emails on 4/28, 5/15, 5/29, 6/15, 7/2, 7/7, 10/8, and 10/22/2020. The case settled. Mediation is complete. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020)
October 29, 2020 Filing 32 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice by Shaunte Jones, James Privette (Beaumont, William) (Filed on 10/29/2020)
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FURTHER CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE. The mediation completion deadline in this case is hereby further extended to a date no more than 45 days after a ruling is issued on the pending motion to dismiss in Szwanek et al. v. Jack in the Box, Inc., Northern District of California Case No. 3:20-cv-02953-WHA. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2020)
August 7, 2020 Filing 30 Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Continue the Mediaation Completion Deadline filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. Responses due by 8/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 8/7/2020)
July 22, 2020 Filing 29 ADR Remark: ADR Phone Conference held on 7/22/2020 by Tamara Lange. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
July 10, 2020 Filing 28 ADR Clerk's Notice Setting ADR Phone Conference on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, at 10:00 AM Pacific time. Please note that you must be logged into an ECF account of counsel of record in order to view this document. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FURTHER CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; EXTENDING DEADLINE. The mediation completion deadline is extended to a date no more than 45 days after a ruling is issued on the pending motion to dismiss in Zamora. Unless, by such date, the procedures governing court-sponsored mediations have been amended to allow for in-person proceedings, the mediation shall be by videoconference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 10, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2020)
June 8, 2020 Filing 26 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #25 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Further Continue Mediation Completion Deadline ) filed byShaunte Jones, James Privette. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beaumont, William) (Filed on 6/8/2020)
June 3, 2020 Filing 25 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Further Continue Mediation Completion Deadline filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. Responses due by 6/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 6/3/2020)
May 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO APPEAR AT MEDIATION IN PERSON; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. The Court finds an in-person mediation is preferable, and, accordingly, the parties are directed to attend any such session in person. If such a mediation is not practicable by the present deadline of June 5, 2020, the parties are to jointly propose a date to which said deadline should be extended. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 11, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2020)
May 8, 2020 Filing 23 Letter from Plaintiffs and Defendant regarding mediation dispute . (Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 5/8/2020)
February 27, 2020 Filing 22 ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Linda Dardarian as Mediator. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2020)
February 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADJUST GENERAL ORDER 56 SCHEDULE FOR SETTING MEDIATION. The deadline for completion of mediation is continued to June 5, 2020. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 12, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2020)
February 6, 2020 Filing 20 MOTION to Continue General Order 56 Schedule for Setting Mediation filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 2/6/2020)
February 6, 2020 Filing 19 Notice of Need for Mediation by William Henry Beaumont (Beaumont, William) (Filed on 2/6/2020)
February 6, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Mediation #19 . Deadline to complete mediation is 5/6/20. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2020)
January 31, 2020 Filing 18 ADR Remark: The Court has received the parties' Notice of Need for Mediation #17 . The parties are instructed to list by name, the counsel who attended the Joint Site Inspection and Settlement Meeting as there are three attorneys listed as plaintiff's counsel and three attorneys listed as defendants' counsel. No mediation referral will be issued until the counsel is listed with specificity. Counsel if also instructed to have counsel for both plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) sign the Notice of Need on the spaces provided. If an extension of time to complete the requirements of General Order 56 is needed, an extension should be requested of the assigned judge. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
January 31, 2020 Filing 17 Notice of Need for Mediation by William Henry Beaumont (Beaumont, William) (Filed on 1/31/2020)
December 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REGARDING JOINT MEETING PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 56. The Joint Meeting of Counsel pursuant to General Order 56 may take place on a mutually available date that is no later than January 10, 2020, and may proceed via videoconference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 13, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2019)
December 12, 2019 Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Joint Meeting Pursuant to General Order 56 filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 12/12/2019)
November 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SUSPEND GENERAL ORDER 56. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 25, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019)
November 18, 2019 Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION from General Order 56 ) filed byTaco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Suspend General Order 56)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 11/18/2019)
November 12, 2019 Filing 12 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION from General Order 56 filed by Shaunte Jones, James Privette. Responses due by 11/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Beaumont, William) (Filed on 11/12/2019)
October 18, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC of Appearance of Counsel and Confirmation of Stay Pursuant to General Order 56 (Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 24, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2019)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. The application of William H. Beaumont is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2019)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. The application of Roberto Luis Costales is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2019)
September 13, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF)
September 13, 2019 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2019)
September 13, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice --Attorney Roberto Luis Costales ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13702217.) filed by Shaunte Jones, James Privette. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/13/2019)
September 13, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice - Attorney William H. Beaumont ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13702129.) filed by Shaunte Jones, James Privette. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/13/2019)
September 12, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/26/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019)
September 12, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/12/2019)
September 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages and Injunctive Relief against Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13697903.). Filed byJames privette, Shaunte Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/12/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Privette et al v. Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Privette
Represented By: Glenn MacRae Goffin
Represented By: William Henry Beaumont
Represented By: Roberto Luis Costales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaunte Jones
Represented By: Glenn MacRae Goffin
Represented By: William Henry Beaumont
Represented By: Roberto Luis Costales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC
Represented By: Carolyn E. Sieve
Represented By: Steven Bernard Katz
Represented By: Cody Thomas Stroman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?