Privette et al v. Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC
James Privette and Shaunte Jones |
Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC |
3:2019cv05729 |
September 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Maxine M Chesney |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 Certification of ADR Session by Mediator Linda Dardarian: I hereby certify that the parties in this matter held mediation conference calls and emails on 4/28, 5/15, 5/29, 6/15, 7/2, 7/7, 10/8, and 10/22/2020. The case settled. Mediation is complete. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2020) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice by Shaunte Jones, James Privette (Beaumont, William) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FURTHER CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE. The mediation completion deadline in this case is hereby further extended to a date no more than 45 days after a ruling is issued on the pending motion to dismiss in Szwanek et al. v. Jack in the Box, Inc., Northern District of California Case No. 3:20-cv-02953-WHA. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 7, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2020) |
Filing 30 Joint ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Continue the Mediaation Completion Deadline filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. Responses due by 8/11/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 8/7/2020) |
Filing 29 ADR Remark: ADR Phone Conference held on 7/22/2020 by Tamara Lange. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2020) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) |
Filing 28 ADR Clerk's Notice Setting ADR Phone Conference on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, at 10:00 AM Pacific time. Please note that you must be logged into an ECF account of counsel of record in order to view this document. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2020) |
Filing 27 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FURTHER CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DEADLINE; EXTENDING DEADLINE. The mediation completion deadline is extended to a date no more than 45 days after a ruling is issued on the pending motion to dismiss in Zamora. Unless, by such date, the procedures governing court-sponsored mediations have been amended to allow for in-person proceedings, the mediation shall be by videoconference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 10, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2020) |
Filing 26 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #25 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Further Continue Mediation Completion Deadline ) filed byShaunte Jones, James Privette. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beaumont, William) (Filed on 6/8/2020) |
Filing 25 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Further Continue Mediation Completion Deadline filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. Responses due by 6/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 6/3/2020) |
Filing 24 ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO APPEAR AT MEDIATION IN PERSON; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. The Court finds an in-person mediation is preferable, and, accordingly, the parties are directed to attend any such session in person. If such a mediation is not practicable by the present deadline of June 5, 2020, the parties are to jointly propose a date to which said deadline should be extended. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 11, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2020) |
Filing 23 Letter from Plaintiffs and Defendant regarding mediation dispute . (Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 5/8/2020) |
Filing 22 ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Linda Dardarian as Mediator. (af, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2020) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ADJUST GENERAL ORDER 56 SCHEDULE FOR SETTING MEDIATION. The deadline for completion of mediation is continued to June 5, 2020. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 12, 2020. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2020) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Continue General Order 56 Schedule for Setting Mediation filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 2/6/2020) |
Filing 19 Notice of Need for Mediation by William Henry Beaumont (Beaumont, William) (Filed on 2/6/2020) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation #19 . Deadline to complete mediation is 5/6/20. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2020) |
Filing 18 ADR Remark: The Court has received the parties' Notice of Need for Mediation #17 . The parties are instructed to list by name, the counsel who attended the Joint Site Inspection and Settlement Meeting as there are three attorneys listed as plaintiff's counsel and three attorneys listed as defendants' counsel. No mediation referral will be issued until the counsel is listed with specificity. Counsel if also instructed to have counsel for both plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) sign the Notice of Need on the spaces provided. If an extension of time to complete the requirements of General Order 56 is needed, an extension should be requested of the assigned judge. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2020) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) |
Filing 17 Notice of Need for Mediation by William Henry Beaumont (Beaumont, William) (Filed on 1/31/2020) |
Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION REGARDING JOINT MEETING PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 56. The Joint Meeting of Counsel pursuant to General Order 56 may take place on a mutually available date that is no later than January 10, 2020, and may proceed via videoconference. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 13, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2019) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Joint Meeting Pursuant to General Order 56 filed by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 12/12/2019) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SUSPEND GENERAL ORDER 56. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 25, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019) |
Filing 13 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION from General Order 56 ) filed byTaco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Suspend General Order 56)(Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 11/18/2019) |
Filing 12 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION from General Order 56 filed by Shaunte Jones, James Privette. Responses due by 11/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Beaumont, William) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC of Appearance of Counsel and Confirmation of Stay Pursuant to General Order 56 (Sieve, Carolyn) (Filed on 10/18/2019) |
Filing 10 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 24, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2019) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. The application of William H. Beaumont is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2019) |
Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. The application of Roberto Luis Costales is granted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 16, 2019. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2019) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice --Attorney Roberto Luis Costales ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13702217.) filed by Shaunte Jones, James Privette. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice - Attorney William H. Beaumont ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13702129.) filed by Shaunte Jones, James Privette. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/13/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/26/2019. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages and Injunctive Relief against Taco Bell Franchisor, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13697903.). Filed byJames privette, Shaunte Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goffin, Glenn) (Filed on 9/12/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.