Martin v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kimberly Martin
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2019cv06585
Filed: October 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42:205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2019 Filing 2 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kimberly Martin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order)(Kons, Joshua) (Filed on 10/14/2019)
October 14, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul. Filed byKimberly Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kons, Joshua) (Filed on 10/14/2019)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Martin
Represented By: Joshua Bradford Kons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?