Smotkin v. Headway Technologies, Inc. et al
Adam Smotkin |
NHK Spring (Thailand) Co., Ltd., TDK Corporation, SAE Magnetics (H.K.) Ltd., NHK Spring Co. Ltd., Magnecomp Precision Technology Public Co. Ltd., Hutchinson Technology Inc., NHK Spring Precision (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., NAT Peripheral (H.K.) Co., Ltd., Headway Technologies, Inc., NHK International Corporation and NAT Peripheral (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd. |
3:2019cv06674 |
October 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Maxine M Chesney |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 15 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Transcript of Proceedings held on November 15, 2019, before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Court Reporter, Marla F. Knox, RPR, CRR, telephone number (602) 391-6990. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (70 in 3:19-md-02918-MMC) Transcript Order ) Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/20/2020. (mfkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Filing 5 ORDER SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK. The initial case management conference is November 15, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., Courtroom 7, 19th Floor. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than November 8, 2019. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 29, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2019) |
DIRECT FILED MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2918 In re: Hard Disk Drive Suspension Assemblies, Smotkin v. Headway Technologies, Inc., Opened in California Northern District as 3:19-cv-06674-MMC cc: JPMDL. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2019) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Headway Technologies, Inc., Hutchinson Technology Inc., Magnecomp Precision Technology Public Co. Ltd., NAT Peripheral (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., NAT Peripheral (H.K.) Co., Ltd., NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring (Thailand) Co., Ltd., NHK Spring Co. Ltd., NHK Spring Precision (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., SAE Magnetics (H.K.) Ltd., TDK Corporation. (mclS, COURT STAFF) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Ruf, Kevin) (Filed on 10/17/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13802308.). Filed byAdam Smotkin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ruf, Kevin) (Filed on 10/17/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.