Zypmedia Inc. et al v. Baran et al
| ZYPMEDIA INC. and JYOTSNA GUPTA |
| Chad Wolf, Kathy A. Baran, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, William P. Barr, Chad F. Wolf and Kenneth Thomas Cuccinelli |
| 4:2019cv08208 |
| December 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Service of Judge's Standing Order by Jyotsna Gupta, Zypmedia Inc. (Matten, Ronald) (Filed on 12/20/2019) Modified on 12/23/2019 (cpS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 12/26/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Kathy A. Baran, William P. Barr, Kenneth Thomas Cuccinelli, Jyotsna Gupta, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION by Jyotsna Gupta, Zypmedia Inc. (Matten, Ronald) (Filed on 12/19/2019) Modified on 12/19/2019 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Matten, Ronald) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
| Filing 3 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] Summons Must be Filed in a Separate Event. Additionally, One Summons Must be Issued for ALL Defendants. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety ONLY Re: #1 -13-17 Proposed Summons filed by Zypmedia Inc., Jyotsna Gupta. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] Consent Form Must be Filed as a Separate Event. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety ONLY Re: #1 -12 Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge filed by Zypmedia Inc., Jyotsna Gupta. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/2/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND EQUITABLE RELIEF against Kathy A. Baran, William P. Barr, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Chad Wolf ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13987867.). Filed byZYPMEDIA INC., JYOTSNA GUPTA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit TABLE OF EXHIBITS, #3 Exhibit H-1B SUBMISSION, #4 Exhibit RECEIPT NOTICE, #5 Exhibit RFE, #6 Exhibit RFE RESPONSE, #7 Exhibit DENIAL, #8 Exhibit APPEAL, #9 Exhibit I290B DECISION, #10 Exhibit DOL MEMORANDUM, #11 Certificate/Proof of Service CERT OF INT PARTIES, #12 CONSENT FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE, #13 Summons SUMMONS USA, #14 Summons SUMMONS BARAN, #15 Summons SUMMONS CUCCINELLI, #16 Summons SUMMONS WOLF, #17 Summons SUMMONS BARR)(Matten, Ronald) (Filed on 12/17/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
