Noe v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
| Frederick Noe |
| JUUL Labs Inc, Pax Labs Inc and Juul Labs Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00148 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Transcript of Proceedings held on February 14, 2020, before Judge William H. Orrick. Court Reporter Belle Ball, CSR, CRR, RDR, telephone number (415)373-2529, belle_ball@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re (376 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (375 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (371 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (374 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order, (373 in 3:19-md-02913-WHO) Transcript Order ) Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/20/2020. (ballbb15S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020) |
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Michigan Western; Case Number 1:19-cv-01042. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2913: Western District of Michigan, 1:19-cv-01042-JTN-PJG, Noe v. Juul Labs, Inc., Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-00148-WHO pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 18 cc: JPMDL. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2020) |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; certified copy received from Northern District of California; case transferred to Northern District of California under MDL No. 2913, JUUL Labs, Inc, Marketing, Sales Pracites, and Products Liability Litigation (mg) |
| Filing 5 COPY of CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation directed to the Northern District of California regarding case to be transferred to the Multidistrict Litigation Panel under MDL No. 2913, JUUL Labs, Inc, Marketing, Sales Pracites, and Products Liability Litigation (mg) |
| Remark: As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer.The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the N.D. California for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 1/2/2020. (mg) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. (mg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (mg) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Ellis, Tiffany) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against JUUL Labs, Inc., PAX Labs, Inc. filed by Frederick Noe (Ellis, Tiffany) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff Frederick Noe in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-4693212 (Ellis, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
