Johnson v. Monsanto Company et al
Tina Johnson |
John Does and Monsanto Company |
3:2020cv00245 |
January 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Arkansas Eastern; Case Number 4:19-cv-00915. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Arkansas Eastern, 19-915, Johnson v. Monsanto Company et al, Opened in California Northern District as 20-245 pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 177 cc: JPMDL (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2020) |
Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-177) transferring this case to the U.S. District Court Northern District of California as part of MDL No. 2741 In Re: Roundup Products Liability.. Signed by the Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 1/6/2020. (jak) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint , filed by Tina Johnson. Monsanto Company served on 12/23/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-B to Affidavit of Service)(Ludwig, Kyle) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT as to Unknown Tortfeasors by Tina Johnson. (ajt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Tina Johnson (Fee $400 paid. Receipt Number LIT075286.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.