McGhee v. Wnuk
Plaintiff: Darrell McGhee
Defendant: Justin Wnuk
Case Number: 3:2020cv03407
Filed: May 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: PSLC MWD
Referring Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Darrell McGhee. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2020)
May 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under the Prisoner Civil Rights Act against Justin Wnuk (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Darrell McGhee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGhee v. Wnuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell McGhee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Wnuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?