Caymus Vineyards v. Newsom et al
Plaintiff: Caymus Vineyards
Defendant: Gavin Newsom and Sonia Angell
Case Number: 4:2020cv03569
Filed: May 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Referring Judge: Kandis A Westmore
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE re Dkt. no. 12. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/15/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2020)
June 10, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by Caymus Vineyards (Harvey, Thomas) (Filed on 6/10/2020)
June 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 6/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2020)
May 29, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2020)
May 29, 2020 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Caymus Vineyards.. (Harvey, Thomas) (Filed on 5/29/2020)
May 29, 2020 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Sonia Angell, Gavin Newsom. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2020)
May 29, 2020 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/26/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/2/2020 01:30 PM. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2020)
May 28, 2020 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/11/2020. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2020)
May 28, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip David White Miller (Miller, Philip) (Filed on 5/28/2020)
May 28, 2020 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Caymus Vineyards (Harvey, Thomas) (Filed on 5/28/2020)
May 28, 2020 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Caymus Vineyards identifying Other Affiliate Emmolo River Ranch LLC, Other Affiliate Mer et Soleil LLC, Other Affiliate Conundrum Winery LLC, Other Affiliate Sea-Sun LLC, Other Affiliate Bonanza Winery LLC, Other Affiliate Wagner, Charles J., Other Affiliate Wagner, Charles F., Other Affiliate Wagner, Joseph J., Other Affiliate Clark, Jennifer W., Other Affiliate Wagner, Erin E. for Caymus Vineyards. (Harvey, Thomas) (Filed on 5/28/2020)
May 28, 2020 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Harvey, Thomas) (Filed on 5/28/2020)
May 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14514561.). Filed byCaymus Vineyards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harvey, Thomas) (Filed on 5/28/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caymus Vineyards v. Newsom et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caymus Vineyards
Represented By: Thomas Andrews Harvey
Represented By: Philip David White Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gavin Newsom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonia Angell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?