President v. Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff: Kenneth President
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Case Number: 3:2020cv06474
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: William Alsup
Referring Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Plaintiff's Request for Dismissal of Entire Action without Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(A); [Proposed] Order by Kenneth President (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 17 Request for Judicial Notice re #16 Opposition/Response to Motion to Remand filed byWalgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-2)(Related document(s) #16 ) (Choi, Traci) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
October 5, 2020 Filing 16 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #13 MOTION to Remand ) filed byWalgreen Co.. (Choi, Traci) (Filed on 10/5/2020)
September 22, 2020 Filing 15 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Walgreen Co.. Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2020 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Responses due by 10/6/2020. Replies due by 10/13/2020. (Eckstrom, Allison) (Filed on 9/22/2020)
September 22, 2020 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON REASSIGNMENT. The Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2020 is continued to 12/17/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge William Alsup. Case Management Statement due by 12/10/2020. Standing orders can be downloaded from the Court's webpage at www.cand.uscourts.gov/whaorders. All pending motions will be taken off calendar and must be renoticed by the moving party for a new hearing date on a Thursday at 08:00 AM. The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the renotice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 73. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: (888) 684-8852Access Code: 3707514The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(amd2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2020) Modified on 9/22/2020 (amd2S, COURT STAFF).
September 21, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Kenneth President. Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2020 08:00 AM before Judge William Alsup. Responses due by 10/5/2020. Replies due by 10/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 9/21/2020)
September 17, 2020 Filing 12 Case REASSIGNED to Judge William Alsup. Judge Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2020)
September 17, 2020 Filing 11 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2020)
September 17, 2020 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2020)
September 17, 2020 Filing 9 Request for Judicial Notice re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed byWalgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Choi, Traci) (Filed on 9/17/2020)
September 17, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Walgreen Co.. Motion Hearing set for 10/27/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 10/1/2020. Replies due by 10/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Choi, Traci) (Filed on 9/17/2020) Modified on 9/25/2020 (jhfS, COURT STAFF).
September 17, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Walgreen Co... (Choi, Traci) (Filed on 9/17/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Walgreen Co. re #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/8/202 0. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/30/2020. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walgreen Co. identifying Corporate Parent Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. for Walgreen Co.. (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Walgreen Co. identifying Corporate Parent Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. for Walgreen Co.. (Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court. Their case number is 20CV368867. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14946423). Filed byWalgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Summons, #2 Exhibit 2-Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3-Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4-Civil Lawsuit Notice, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Archibald, Christopher) (Filed on 9/16/2020)
September 16, 2020 #Electronic filing error. Case has been randomly assigned to magistrate judge, however incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used at case opening of JS44 (Rev. 06/17). Please complete and r e-file in its entirety as a separate docket entry Civil Cover Sheet JS-CAND 44 (Rev. 07/19 re: #1 . #5 filed by Walgreen Co. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2020)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: President v. Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth President
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: William Matthew Pao
Represented By: Jose Maria Dominado Patino, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Represented By: Christopher J. Archibald
Represented By: Traci G. Choi
Represented By: Allison Clare Eckstrom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?