Tejera v. Monsanto Company
Ramon Tejera |
Monsanto Company |
3:2020cv06507 |
September 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 10/15/2020) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 10/15/2020) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 10/15/2020) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: re 3:16-md-02741-VC; Southern District of Florida, 9:20-cv-81358-RKA Tejera v. Monsanto Company, opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-6507-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 233 cc: JPMDL (gbaS-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2020) |
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 9:20-cv-81358. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-233) transferring case to the Northern District of California re: MDL 2741 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. (Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel). (mc) |
Civil Case Terminated per DE #4 Conditional Transfer Order. Closing Case. (mc) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13383304, payment transferred from : 0:20-cv-61686, filed by Ramon Tejera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Conze, Kertch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tejera v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Represented By: | Joe G. Hollingsworth |
Represented By: | Eric G. Lasker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ramon Tejera | |
Represented By: | Kertch J. Conze |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.