Roushion v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
| John Roushion |
| Commissioner of Social Secuity |
| 4:2020cv07096 |
| October 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Secuity.. (Sachelari, Paul) (Filed on 11/3/2020) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by the Clerk on 11/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2020)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2020) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Roushion.. (Pena-Mancinas, Jonathan) (Filed on 10/29/2020) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/12/2020. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2020) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed in a Social Security Case by John Roushion. Commissioner of Social Secuity served on 10/20/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Pena-Mancinas, Jonathan) (Filed on 10/20/2020) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Secuity, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2020) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Pena-Mancinas, Jonathan) (Filed on 10/20/2020) |
| Filing 4 ***DISREGARD. FILED IN ERROR BY CLERK***Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/13/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/20/2021 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2020) Modified on 10/13/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/27/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Secuity ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15051792.). Filed byJohn Roushion. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena-Mancinas, Jonathan) (Filed on 10/12/2020) Modified on 10/13/2020 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 10/20/2020 (jmlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Roushion v. Commissioner of Social Secuity | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Roushion | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Omar Pena-Mancinas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Secuity | |
| Represented By: | Paul Sachelari |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
