LaPerla v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
| Giuliana LaPerla |
| eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Riaz Valani, Phillip Morris USA, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Mother Murphys Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., JUUL LABS, INC, Hoyoung Huh, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Chevron Corporation, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., Walmart, Circle K Stores Inc., Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc. and Speedway LLC |
| 3:2020cv07110 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28:1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| #Electronic filing error. E-filer is reminded to enter ALL parties on the docket as named in the Complaint. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessar y. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Giuliana LaPerla. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| Filing 4 FEE PAID (Filing fee$400,receipt number 0971-15061771). (Swords, Sean) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF NON-PAYMENT Please be advised that the filing fee has not been received in this case. The fee must be paid within two business days or the case will be subject to termination. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Hoyoung Huh, Juul Labs, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphys Labs, Inc., Phillip Morris USA, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Riaz Valani, eLiquitech, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020) |
| DIRECT FILE MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2913, LaPerla v Juul Labs, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:20-cv-07110 WHO cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2020) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 3:19-md-02913-WHO. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2020) |
| Filing 1 SHORT-FORM COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (PERSONAL INJURY) against All Defendants. Filed by Giuliana LaPerla. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) [Proposed] Summons)(Swords, Sean) (Filed on 10/13/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
