Amazon.com, Inc. v. Sleja, Inc. et al
| Amazon.com, Inc. |
| Heena Aggarwal, Alexa Web Services Inc., Sleja, Inc., Rajinder Singh, Neelam Rani, Bharat Aggarwal, Expert Tech Rogers Pvt. Ltd., Swatanter Gupta and Chetan Parkash |
| 4:2020cv07405 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Phyllis J Hamilton |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION Second Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants Heena Aggarwal and Bharat Aggarwal to Respond to Complaint filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Freed, John) (Filed on 12/18/2020) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Approve Alternative Service of India-Based Defendants Via Electronic Mail re #1 Complaint filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. Responses due by 12/23/2020. Replies due by 12/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Freed, John) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Amazon.com, Inc. (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/24/2020) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendants Heena Aggarwal and Bharat Aggarwal to Respond to Complaint Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), filed by Amazon.com, Inc., Heena Aggarwal, Bharat Aggarwal. (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/19/2020) Modified on 11/20/2020 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #10 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #12 Order, Service on Defendant Heena Aggarwal, filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/18/2020) Modified on 11/19/2020 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #10 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #12 Order. Service on Defendant Bharat Aggarwal, filed by Amazon.com, Inc.. (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/18/2020) Modified on 11/19/2020 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #10 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #12 Order. Service on Defendant Alexa Web Services, Inc., filed by Amazon.com, Inc. (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/18/2020) Modified on 11/19/2020 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #10 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #12 Order. Service on Defendant Sleja, Inc., filed by Amazon.com, Inc. (Freed, John) (Filed on 11/18/2020) Modified on 11/19/2020 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/14/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2021 at 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 3, 3rd Floor. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/4/2020. (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2020)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned pursuant to General Order No 67 Patent Pilot Program to Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton for all further proceedings. Judge James Donato no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 11/4/20. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2020)
|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Bharat Aggarwal, Heena Aggarwal, Alexa Web Services Inc., Expert Tech Rogers Pvt. Ltd., Swatanter Gupta, Chetan Parkash, Neelam Rani, Rajinder Singh, Sleja, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2020) |
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Amazon.com, Inc. (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/27/2020) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by Amazon.com, Inc. (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/27/2020) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. Summons is missing defendants, please refile or amend complaint. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #6 Proposed Summons filed by Amazon.com, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2020) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/23/2020) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/14/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2020) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a Trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/23/2020) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Freed, John) (Filed on 10/23/2020) |
| #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file a single summons, with defendants to be served on attachment page. Please remember to include ALL defendants listed in complaint when re-filing. Re: #3 Proposed Summons filed by Amazon.com, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2020) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge James Donato. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-15098782.). Filed byAmazon.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freed, John) (Filed on 10/22/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
