Proctor v. Worthington Cylinder Corporation
| Taos Proctor and Kelly Proctor |
| The Coleman Company, Inc., Worthington Cylinder Corporation and WALMART INC. |
| 3:2021cv00059 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Sallie Kim |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Donato on 2/10/2021. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2021) |
Filing 14
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/15/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco before Judge James Donato. Case Management Statement due by 4/8/2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/19/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021)
|
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by The Coleman Company, Inc., WALMART INC., Worthington Cylinder Corporation.. (Ergo, Richard) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 1/15/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Taos Proctor.. (Alch, Thomas) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 1/21/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2021) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Acceptance with Offer of Judgment by Taos Proctor and Kelly Proctor (Alch, Thomas) (Filed on 1/12/2021) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/12/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint byWALMART INC., Worthington Cylinder Corporation. (See "Affidavit" #5 pages 53 & 60) (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2021) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/20/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT re #4 Amended Notice of Removal by The Coleman Company, Inc., WALMART INC., Worthington Cylinder Corporation. (Ergo, Richard) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Kelly Proctor, Taos Proctor. Filed byWALMART INC., The Coleman Company, Inc., Worthington Cylinder Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Ergo, Richard) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by The Coleman Company, Inc., WALMART INC., Worthington Cylinder Corporation . (Ergo, Richard) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
| Filing 2 FEE PAID (Filing fee$402,receipt number 0971-15405917). (Ergo, Richard) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. Filing fee not paid. Please pay the filing fee through Pay.gov by clicking on Civil > Other Documents > New Case Filing Fee in CM/ECF. [err701] Re:[ 1] Amended Notice of Removal filed by The Coleman Company, Inc., Worthington Cylinder Corporation, WALMART INC. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021) |
| Filing 1 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Worthington Cylinder Corporation, The Coleman Company, Inc., WALMART INC.. Filed byWorthington Cylinder Corporation, The Coleman Company, Inc., WALMART INC.. (Ergo, Richard) (Filed on 1/5/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
