Carrillo v. Napa Superior Court
| Napa Superior Court |
| Francisco Carrillo |
| 3:2021cv02092 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC AGB |
| James Donato |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Copy of #5 Order resent to petitioner's new mailing address. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2021) |
| Filing 8 Mail sent to Francisco Carrillo returned as undeliverable re #5 Order. Mail Returned; response required by 7/6/2021. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2021) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address filed by Francisco Carrillo (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2021) |
Filing 5
ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Francisco Carrillo. Signed by Judge James Donato on 4/7/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Signed by the Clerk on 3/30/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 3/29/21. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Francisco Carrillo. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2021) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00- Paid. Receipt #: 34611153569.) filed by Francisco Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Filling Fee Receipt, #3 Envelope)(bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carrillo v. Napa Superior Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Francisco Carrillo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Napa Superior Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
