James v. United Furniture Workers Local 89262
| Anthony A James and Anthony Alexander James |
| United Furniture Workers Local 89262 |
| 3:2021cv03893 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Li, Danica) (Filed on 7/23/2021) |
| Filing 12 REPLY (re #4 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byUnited Furniture Workers Local 89262. (Li, Danica) (Filed on 6/22/2021) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING MOTION HEARING AND INITIAL CASE MGMT CONFERENCE. ZOOM NOTICE. Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2021. Initial Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing as to #8 MOTION to NOT Dismiss, and #4 MOTION to Dismiss ., re-set for 8/13/2021 09:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jcs General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telepho ne or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record list ed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive on 6/17/2021. |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United Furniture Workers Local 89262 (Li, Danica) (Filed on 6/16/2021) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United Furniture Workers Local 89262.. (Li, Danica) (Filed on 6/16/2021) |
| Filing 8 MOTION Not to Dismiss Complaint filed by Anthony Alexander James. Responses due by 6/21/2021. Replies due by 6/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
| Filing 7 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Anthony Alexander James. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Anthony Alexander James. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 6/16/2021. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:Drive on 6/2/2021. |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss - MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by United Furniture Workers Local 89262. Motion Hearing set for 7/9/2021 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 6/15/2021. Replies due by 6/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration, #3 [Proposed] Order)(Li, Danica) (Filed on 6/1/2021) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 8 /20/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2021 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/7/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court of California. Their case number is HG21095053, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-16004109). Filed by United Furniture Workers Local 89262. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Li, Danica) (Filed on 5/24/2021) Modified on 5/25/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
