Galang v. United States Department of Treasury, et al
| Marlon Galang |
| Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen, Department of State, Department of Treasury, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, IRS Commissioner Charles P. Rettig, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, United States Department of Treasury, Janet L. Yellen, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of State and Antony J. Blinken |
| 3:2021cv04320 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Alex G Tse |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Order by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting #7 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines. The government's response to plaintiff's complaint is due by September 23, 2021. The initial case management conference is continued to November 12, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. The joint case management statement is due by November 5, 2021. (agtlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Marlon Galang.. (Singh, Sandeep) (Filed on 7/28/2021) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER between Plaintiff and Defendants filed by Antony J. Blinken, Internal Revenue Service, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of State, United States Department of Treasury, Janet L. Yellen. (Ramirez, E. Carmen) (Filed on 7/28/2021) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF served on DEFENDANTS on 6/10/2021, filed by Marlon Galang. (Singh, Sandeep) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Antony J. Blinken, Internal Revenue Service, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of State, United States Department of Treasury, Janet L. Yellen. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/3/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
| Erroneous Entry - Please Disregard: Filing fee has been paid. Filing fee has to be paid asap, #Electronic filing error. Filing fee not paid. Please pay the filing fee through Pay.gov by clicking on Civil > Other Documents > New Case Filing Fee in CM/ECF. [err701] Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Marlon Galang (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) Modified on 6/8/2021 (asS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/21/2021. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Marlon Galang (Singh, Sandeep) (Filed on 6/7/2021) |
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
