Barth v. C.S.R. Doe-1 et al
Plaintiff: Shawn Damon Barth
Defendant: L. Johnson, C.S.R. Doe-1, Lyon and Doe-2
Case Number: 3:2021cv04363
Filed: June 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: PSLC MWD
Referring Judge: William H Orrick
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shawn Damon Barth. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2021) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2021: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF).
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Show Cause Response due by 8/23/2021. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/20/2021. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
June 9, 2021 mailed copy of re #3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis to Plaintiff. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2021)
June 8, 2021 Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 7/16/2021. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
June 8, 2021 Filing 2 PRISONER'S APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shawn Damon Barth. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)
June 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Under The Civil Rights Act (no process) against C.S.R. Doe-1, Doe-2, L. Johnson, Lyon, (Filing Fee: ifp entered 6/9/2021). Filed by Shawn Damon Barth. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibits (part 1), #(2) Exhibits (part 2), #(3) Exhibits (part 3), #(4) Envelope) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barth v. C.S.R. Doe-1 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C.S.R. Doe-1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe-2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Damon Barth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?