Beltran v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC
Manuel Beltran |
ABM Industry Groups, LLC |
4:2021cv04506 |
June 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Donna M Ryu |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE- Remanding Case to San Francisco Superior Court. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #16 Stipulation to Remand to State Court. Motions terminated: #13 Motion to Remand filed by Manuel Beltran. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/2/2021. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021) |
Filing 17 Proposed Order re #16 Stipulation for Remand by ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 7/30/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. NOTICE: Counsel is directed to file a proposed order. In the future, filings like this should always be accompanied with a proposed order. [err102]. Re:[ 16] Stipulation to Remand to State Court filed by ABM Industry Groups, LLC (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2021) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Remand to State Court filed by ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 7/29/2021) |
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE Plaintiff's motion to remand #13 was noticed for hearing on a date that is not an available hearing date on Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu's calendar. The 9/14/2021 hearing date is VACATED. Plaintiff shall re-notice (not re-file) the motion for a hearing in compliance with Local Rule 7-2(a) and Judge Ryu's Standing Order. The briefing schedule remains in effect. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dmrlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2021) |
Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Manuel Beltran.. (Astanehe, Michael) (Filed on 7/13/2021) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Manuel Beltran. Motion Hearing set for 9/14/2021 01:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 7/27/2021. Replies due by 8/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service, #2 Declaration Declaration, #3 Memorandum of Points & Authorities, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Astanehe, Michael) (Filed on 7/13/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. Please re-file in its entirety as the motion does not comply with Civil Local Rule 7-2(a) Re: #12 MOTION to Remand filed by Manuel Beltran (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2021) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Remand filed by Manuel Beltran. Motion Hearing set for 8/10/2021 01:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Responses due by 7/26/2021. Replies due by 8/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum of Points & Authorities, #3 Declaration, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Astanehe, Michael) (Filed on 7/12/2021) Modified on 7/13/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/13/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2021) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by ABM Industry Groups, LLC.. (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/15/2021) |
Filing 9 Proof Service of Required Documents by ABM Industry Groups, LLC (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/15/2021) Modified on 6/16/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 9/8/2021 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/15/2021 01:30 PM. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2021) |
Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/28/2021. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2021) |
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (bnsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2021) |
Filing 6 Civil Cover Sheet by ABM Industry Groups, LLC . (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/11/2021) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by Paul M Teinert (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/11/2021) Modified on 6/14/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Eric J. Wersching filed by Paul M Teinert (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/11/2021) Modified on 6/14/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by ABM Industry Groups, LLC (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/11/2021) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by ABM Industry Groups, LLC (Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/11/2021) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco County Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-20-583848. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16066748). Filed by ABM Industry Groups, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul M. Teinert, #2 Declaration of Allison Nelson, #3 Civil Cover Sheet- Re-filed at Docket No #6 )(Teinert, Paul) (Filed on 6/11/2021) Modified on 6/14/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF). |
#Electronic filing error. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet. Use October 2020 version which can be downloaded from https://cand.uscourts.gov/. No judge assignment will be made unti l the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by ABM Industry Groups, LLC (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Beltran v. ABM Industry Groups, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ABM Industry Groups, LLC | |
Represented By: | Paul M Teinert |
Represented By: | Eric Joseph Wersching |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Manuel Beltran | |
Represented By: | Michael Astanehe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.