Vasquez v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC et al
| Nick Vasquez |
| Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC doing business as Suddenlink Communications and ALTICE USA, INC. |
| 3:2021cv06400 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #19 Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2021)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to File Surresponse filed by Nick Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Surresponse, #2 Proposed Order)(Corrington, Che) (Filed on 10/12/2021) |
| Filing 18 REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation ) filed byAltice USA, Inc., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC. (Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 10/8/2021) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2021)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number 0971-16460269) filed by Nick Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Corrington, Che) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address by Paul Karl Lukacs (Lukacs, Paul) (Filed on 10/2/2021) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation ) filed byNick Vasquez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hattis, Daniel) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE ADVANCING HEARING RE: #12 MOTION TO COMPEL FROM 10/28/2021 TO 10/21/2021 AT 1:30PM: Hearing re #12 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation set for 10/28/2021 is vacated and advanced to 10/21/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Edward M. Chen. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Motion briefing deadlines remain unchanged.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/emcGeneral Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Motion Hearing set for 10/21/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Edward M. Chen. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2021) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Altice USA, Inc., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 10/28/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 10/1/2021. Replies due by 10/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robyn DiStefano, #2 Exhibit A as to DiStefano Declaration, #3 Exhibit B as to DiStefano Declaration, #4 Declaration of Jeffrey Kelly, #5 Exhibit A as to Kelly Declaration, #6 Exhibit B as to Kelly Declaration, #7 Exhibit C as to Kelly Declaration, #8 Proposed Order)(Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 9/17/2021) |
|
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/14/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/7/2021. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/13/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2021)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 9/3/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (glmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Altice USA, Inc., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC.. (Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 9/1/2021) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION to Extend Responsive Pleading Deadline filed by Altice USA, Inc., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC. (Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 8/24/2021) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Altice USA, Inc., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC re 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman's Standing Orders (Supplemental and Settement Conference), etc. (Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 8/20/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/9/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/16/2021 at 2:00 PM in McKinleyville, To Be Determined. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/2/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2021) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ALTICE USA, INC., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, (Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 8/18/2021) |
| Filing 2 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by ALTICE USA, INC., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Cequel Communications, LLC, Other Affiliate ALTICE USA, INC., Other Affiliate Cebridge Telecom Limited, LLC, Other Affiliate CSC Holdings LLC, Other Affiliate Cablevision Systems Corp for Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC; Other Affiliate ALTICE USA, INC. for ALTICE USA, INC.. (Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 8/18/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Humboldt County Superior Court. Their case number is CV2100639. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16298834). Filed by Altice USA, Inc., Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parasharami, Archis) (Filed on 8/18/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
