Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Vagaro, Inc.
Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC |
Vagaro, Inc. |
3:2021cv07927 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC.. (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, - Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Answer filed by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC. (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 10/27/2021) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC. Vagaro, Inc. served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 10/25/2021) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Vagaro, Inc.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/30/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/22/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2021) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Patent Infringement. (cc: form mailed to register). (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 10/8/2021) Modified on 10/13/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 10/8/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement; Jury Trial Demanded against Vagaro, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number 0971-16480530.). Filed by Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kalra, Susan) (Filed on 10/8/2021) Modified on 10/13/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Vagaro, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Susan S Q Kalra |
Represented By: | Susan S.Q. Kalra |
Represented By: | William P. Ramey, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vagaro, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.