Uharriet v. MyLife.com, Inc.
| James Uharriet, Aviva Kellman, Alison Bockius and Karen Evans |
| MyLife.com, Inc. |
| PeopleConnect, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv08229 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by James Uharriet re #10 Summons Issued (Ram, Michael) (Filed on 12/15/2021) |
Filing 21
Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #20 Motion for Pro Hac Vice - Borrelli. (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2021)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-16700281.) filed by Alison Bockius, Karen Evans, Aviva Kellman, James Uharriet. (Borrelli, Raina) (Filed on 12/8/2021) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE re #17 Notice (Other) PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTION OR PROCEEDING (L.R. 3-13) by James Uharriet. (Ram, Michael) (Filed on 12/7/2021) |
| Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against MyLife.com, Inc.. Filed by James Uharriet, Aviva Kellman, Alison Bockius, Karen Evans. (Ram, Michael) (Filed on 12/3/2021) Modified on 12/6/2021 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by MyLife.com, Inc. Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding (Gorham, Gary) (Filed on 11/24/2021) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint filed by MyLife.com, Inc.. (Gorham, Gary) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MyLife.com, Inc. (Gorham, Gary) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by MyLife.com, Inc. Initial Disclosures Pursuant to FRCP 26 (L.R. 3-15) (Gorham, Gary) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary J Gorham on behalf of Defendant MyLife.com, Inc. (Gorham, Gary) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE. In case 20-cv-9203-EMC, 74 Plaintiff's motion to relate is DENIED. The Court also denies Defendant's request for sanctions in the form of the costs incurred in responding to Plaintiff's motion. However, the Court emphasizes that it agrees with Defendant that the motion to relate is baseless under the standard set in Local Rule 3-12 (requiring, e.g., that the actions concern substantially the same parties, property, transaction, or event). Plaintiff's counsel is forewarned that it risks being sanctioned in the future should it engage in similar conduct. The motion to relate was a waste of the parties' time as well as the Court's. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2021) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by PeopleConnect, Inc. / Notice of Lodging of Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related under Civil L.R. 7-11 and Request for Judicial Notice in Support Thereof (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Spelman, Kate) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to MyLife.com, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2021) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Ram, Michael) (Filed on 10/26/2021) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by James Uharriet Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Under Civil L.R. 7-11 (Ram, Michael) (Filed on 10/26/2021) |
| Filing 7 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 1/12/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/19/2022 at 02:00 PM by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances:< /b< Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Thursday, January 13th, 2022, by no later than 10:00AM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.). (bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2021) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2021)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2021) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by James Uharriet.. (Ram, Michael) (Filed on 10/22/2021) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/14/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2022 02:00 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/5/2021. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MyLife.com, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16523815.). Filed byJames Uharriet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ram, Michael) (Filed on 10/21/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
