Nettles v. Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC
| Simone Nettles |
| Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC |
| 3:2021cv08895 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 14, 2022. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2022)
|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE re #18 Request for Judicial Notice Plaintiff Simone Nettles' Opposition to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Opposition of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand by Simone Nettles. (Kramer, Daniel) (Filed on 1/10/2022) |
| Filing 20 REPLY (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed bySimone Nettles. (Kramer, Daniel) (Filed on 1/10/2022) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT COURTESY COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 5, 2022. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2022)
|
| Filing 18 Request for Judicial Notice re #17 Opposition/Response to Motion to Remand filed byParamedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Wojcik, Timothy) (Filed on 1/3/2022) |
| Filing 17 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #16 MOTION to Remand ) filed byParamedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC. (Wojcik, Timothy) (Filed on 1/3/2022) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #16 MOTION to Remand . Motion Hearing set for 1/21/2022 at 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2021) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Simone Nettles. Motion Hearing set for 1/20/2022 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Responses due by 1/3/2022. Replies due by 1/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kramer, Daniel) (Filed on 12/17/2021) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND NOTICE OF RELATED CASES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 7, 2021. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2021)
|
|
Filing 14
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/18/2022 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/11/2022.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/7/2021. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2021)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 12/7/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2021)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2021) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Simone Nettles.. (Aramayo, Charles) (Filed on 12/3/2021) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by December 6, 2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2021) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC.. (Wojcik, Timothy) (Filed on 11/19/2021) |
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/10/202 2. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2021) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint (Removal #1 Exhibit 3) byParamedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2021) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC re 6 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Williams, Tracy) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/1/2021. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,, #3 Notice (Other), #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Interested Entities (Williams, Tracy) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,, #3 Notice (Other), #2 Civil Cover Sheet (Williams, Tracy) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,, #2 Civil Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A to Notice of Related Cases)(Williams, Tracy) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Paramedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC . (Williams, Tracy) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Alameda. Their case number is RG21113284. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-16635771). Filed byParamedics Logistics Operating Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Dec of TR Williams ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit Ex A to Dec of TR Williams ISO Removal, #3 Exhibit Ex B to Dec of TR Williams ISO Removal, #4 Declaration Dec of S Fountain ISO Removal, #5 Exhibit Ex 1 to Dec of S Fountain ISO Removal)(Williams, Tracy) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
