Levi Strauss & Co. v. Connolly
| Levi Strauss & Co. |
| David Connolly |
| 5:2022cv04106 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Levi Strauss & Co.. David Connolly served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/12/2022. (Bricker, Ryan) (Filed on 8/25/2022) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Levi Strauss & Co... (Bricker, Ryan) (Filed on 8/2/2022) |
| Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2022) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to David Connolly. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2022) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/4/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/11/2022 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2022) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Levi Strauss & Co. (Bricker, Ryan) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/27/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Bricker, Ryan) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Bricker, Ryan) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Connolly ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17348235.). Filed byLevi Strauss & Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bricker, Ryan) (Filed on 7/13/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Levi Strauss & Co. v. Connolly | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Levi Strauss & Co. | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Bricker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Connolly | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
