US Right to Know v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
| US Right to Know |
| United States Department of Health and Human Services |
| 3:2022cv04328 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United States Department of Health and Human Services.. (Molinari, Gioconda) (Filed on 9/20/2022) |
| Filing 13 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint byUnited States Department of Health and Human Services. (Molinari, Gioconda) (Filed on 9/19/2022) |
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice re Daniel C. Snyder. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2022)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-17538264.) filed by US Right to Know. (Snyder, Daniel) (Filed on 9/15/2022) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed (FOIA) by US Right to Know. United States Department of Health and Human Services served on 8/18/2022, answer due 9/21/2022. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 9/8/2022) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed (FOIA) by US Right to Know. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 9/8/2022) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed (FOIA) by US Right to Know. United States Department of Health and Human Services served on 8/22/2022, answer due 9/21/2022. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 9/8/2022) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBITS re #1 Complaint, filed byUS Right to Know. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 8/16/2022) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by US Right to Know.. (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 8/10/2022) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United States Department of Health and Human Services. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2022) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/20/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/27/2022 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/10/2022. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Department of Health and Human Services ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17387537.). Filed byUS Right to Know. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 7/27/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
